At first
![](http://static.technorati.com/static/img/pub/icon-utag-16x13.png?tag=gum+disease)
According to an article published in the highly prestigious The Lancet Oncology, researchers at the imperial College of London (UK) found that people with gum disease have a higher overall risk of cancer, whether or not they're smokers and nonsmokers.
The researchers discovered that after adjusting for details about the history of smoking, dietary factors, and other known risk factors, participants with a history of gum disease were 14% more likely to develop any type of cancer compared to those without history of gum disease.
Looking at specific cancer risks, those with a history of gum disease had the following increases in cancer risk compared to those without a history of gum disease:
![](http://static.technorati.com/static/img/pub/icon-utag-16x13.png?tag=Lung+Cancer)
![](http://static.technorati.com/static/img/pub/icon-utag-16x13.png?tag=Kidney+Cancer)
![](http://static.technorati.com/static/img/pub/icon-utag-16x13.png?tag=Pancreatic+Cancer)
![](http://static.technorati.com/static/img/pub/icon-utag-16x13.png?tag=Hematological+Cancer)
Gum disease, such as periodontis or
![](http://static.technorati.com/static/img/pub/icon-utag-16x13.png?tag=gingivitis)
The article authors summarize their results this way; "Gum disease was associated with a small, but significant, increase in overall cancer risk, which persisted in never-smokers. The associations recorded for lung cancer are probably because of residual confounding by smoking. The increased risks noted for haematological, kidney, and pancreatic cancers need confirmation, but suggest that gum disease might be a marker of a susceptible immune system or might directly affect cancer risk."
Is it that straightforward that by brushing twice a day we
ReplyDeletecan avoid having to treat gum disease altogether?